This report sponsored by Siemens under a program initiated by the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) 
Report Contents:
Report Summary
This book provides strategic advice on development priorities for Bogotá by looking at the metropolis from an angle different than is traditionally used by planners. To do so, we analysed how the city performs across a broad array of criteria defining the quality of urban life. Hence, we benchmarked Bogotá against world-class cities, such as Paris and New York, labelled the “capitals” of the 19th and 20th centuries.
The benchmark provides the background for a SWOT analysis (Strengths and Weaknesses of today and the Opportunities and Threats of tomorrow), and thus forms the basis for proposing the most appropriate direction for the future development of Bogotá. This direction is expressed by the sub-title of the initiative: “towards aworld-class, transit-oriented metropolis.”
The initiative identifies priority measures and proposes immediate actions for selected projects, many of them transit-related. This emphasis is because the improvement of the transportation system in general, and the public transit system in particular, contributes the most to the greater good in a megacity like Bogotá.
The Bogotá 21 initiative looks into the budget needed to transform Bogotá into a top-performing metropolis by 2050. After optimising the portfolio of investments, we recommend most suitable budget allocations to the main areas of infrastructure development, in order to identify the minimum investment budget.
This amount, about 4.2% of the national Gross Domestic Product (GDP), needs to be spent annually to develop Bogotá into a world-class, transit-oriented metropolis. However, this cost would not be spent for the development of Bogotá alone, but also for the development and the benefit of Colombia as a whole.
Two guiding principles were applied when carrying out this initiative. The first is to maintain a fair balance of benefits for Bogotá and the country as a whole. The second principle is to practise moderation and avoid any kind of overspending towards luxury, beyond what is sufficient.
About one third of the proposed investment would be dedicated to the development of the nation, especially of the transportation infrastructure, including inland waterways, railways, and roads. This would help Bogotá live up to the needs of the nation as the central logistics hub of Colombia, and also cut the tremendous cost of logistics that prevail today.
If the investment portfolio proposed by the Bogotá 21 Initiative were to be implemented, then the city would be on par with metropolises such as Berlin, New York and Paris by 2050. It would become a candidate for the honourable title, “capital of the 21st century.” It is not a dream, it is an option.
# # #
Proposed areas of priority Actions
Disclaimer:
The development partnership “Bogotá 21” with Siemens is part of the develoPPP.deprogramme that Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusamme-narbeit (GIZ) GmbH implements on behalf of the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ). It is carried out by independent research partners. They are responsible for the methodology, data collection and analysis as well as report edition. Findings, interpretations and conclusions expressed in this document are based on information gathered by the consultants, partners and contributors of the project.
Research Partners
- ITS Infratrans Consultancy
- Consultoría Colombiana
- Universidad de los Andes: CIE Movilidad Sostenible
- Fundación Despacio
- Bicivilízate (graphic production)
# # #
Accompanying video:
Click here to view ten minute video with English sub-titles: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1WDf3N2pIRY# # #
The Editor Comments:
Is this a good and useful report? Upon first read it appears to do the job at its intended target, i.e., figuring out what the menu of the transit infrastructure requirements and expenditures of that great city might look like to and through the middle of this turbulent century. All that based on quite a hefty chain of assumptions.
Is it adequate from the overall planning perspective that I for one believe to be appropriate and necessary for sustainable mobility in cities? For people? Hmm. It looks to me like a useful but as it stands far from sufficient step in the planning and implementation process -- and certainly so given the needs of that great and flailing city when it comes to mobility and quality of life. But let's thank the powers that be for the blessings they offer, give this a good read, learn the lessons it offers, and then get back to work on figuring out the requirements and priorities of the city and above all its people from the necessary much broader perspective. Because that's the job that needs to get done.
# #
PS. The day after originally posting this and upon rereading the report and reflection, I write this.
Lyon, France. 5 November 2012
Dear Siemens and GIZ,
You will excuse me but I am deeply disappointed in your Bogotá report. You people have such a huge range of experience and resources in the transport field in the broadest sense, and you could have, had you chosen to, put your full brain, competence and imagination to work on this. You did not.
Even had you had limited yourselves to what is happening in and transforming leading edge cities and projects in Germany, your homeland, this could have been really quite a help to our friends in Bogotá. But you did not and I am sorry because this report cost a lot of money and is getting a lot of attention, which is in itself quite a problem. The issues at stake are so important, and complex, that we need to be very careful in not allowing ourselves to be distracted by anything that is less than the best. I very much hope that next time in the next city you will give it your very best. Because that could be terrific and a real contribution.
Signed/Eric Britton
Print this article
Posts
I was struck by the lack of detail and transparency in this report. 35% of the proposed transport budget should be used for 'private transport' according to the authors, so what is meant exactly? Aha, it's largely "densification of the national dual carriageway road network", which would undermine the PT investment and plans for sustainable logistics... The usual blind spot on aviation's longer-term environmental and economic costs is hardly a surprise: a narrow capital cost analysis will inevitably favour airport expansion over the construction, operation and maintenance of inter-city railways.
ReplyDeleteThey have correctly identified that TransMilenio provides insufficient capacity, but then leapt to the conclusion that metro is the answer. It might be, but why no mention of light rail? This could be built at a lower cost and, where routes do not run down the middle of the highway, avoid the severance effects of BRT and surface-based heavy rail. It might also be possible for light rail to remain on the surface in the city centre. Has a thorough capacity analysis been carried out?
Similarly road pricing is mentioned at length, to the exclusion of parking policy, but there's some good stuff in there on land value capture. Overall I would have expected better.