The New York Times is generally doing a yeoman's job of providing useful investigative coverage and commentary on the environment-climate-new mobility front. And for that we all are most grateful. However in this tough game no one goes ten for ten at bat, and in this article today on Vélib they have really missed the ball. Guess we have to be a bit careful concerning about what we read in the paper (Streets included, of course)
Before you dig into their piece however, let me draw a handful of earlier reports on just this which are a lot closer to having their facts straight. (And by the time that you get to the Time's Halloween piece below, you surely have to wonder what the fuss is all these months later. Strike three on this one. But you will have plenty more Times at bat.)
From Le Parisien – 9 February 2009
Les Vélib' décimés par le vandalisme - http://www.leparisien.fr/paris-75/les-velib-decimes-par-le-vandalisme-09-02-2009-404833.php_ (Strike 1)
From Streetsblog – 12 February 2009
Reports of Vélib demise greatly exaggerated, by Ben Fried.
http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/02/12/reports-of-velibs-demise-greatly-exaggerated/
From World Streets:
Reports of Vélib demise greatly exaggerated – 12 February 2009 http://newmobilityagenda.blogspot.com/2009/02/reports-of-velibs-demise-greatly.html
The End of City Bikes: Vandalism, Theft and the End of the World" – 19 February 2009 -http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/WorldCityBike/message/627 (New Mobility's World City Bike Forum)
Happy Birthday Vélib' (Oh dear, what's wrong with you?) – 26 June 2009 http://newmobilityagenda.blogspot.com/2009/06/happy-birthday-velib-oh-dear-whats.html
Happy Birthday Vélib': Now you are two – 15 July 2009
http://newmobilityagenda.blogspot.com/2009/07/happy-birthday-velib-now-you-are-two.html
------------------------------
And now, from our second favorite English-language daily, The New York Times
October 31, 2009 – Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/31/world/europe/31bikes.html?ref=europe
French Ideal of Bicycle-Sharing Meets Reality
By Steven Erlanger and Maïa De La Baume
PARIS — Just as Le Corbusier’s white cruciform towers once excited visions of the industrial-age city of the future, so Vélib’, Paris’s bicycle rental system, inspired a new urban ethos for the era of climate change.
Residents here can rent a sturdy bicycle from hundreds of public stations and pedal to their destinations, an inexpensive, healthy and low-carbon alternative to hopping in a car or bus.
But this latest French utopia has met a prosaic reality: Many of the specially designed bikes, which cost $3,500 each, are showing up on black markets in Eastern Europe and northern Africa. Many others are being spirited away for urban joy rides, then ditched by roadsides, their wheels bent and tires stripped.
With 80 percent of the initial 20,600 bicycles stolen or damaged, the program’s organizers have had to hire several hundred people just to fix them. And along with the dent in the city-subsidized budget has been a blow to the Parisian psyche.
“The symbol of a fixed-up, eco-friendly city has become a new source for criminality,” Le Monde mourned in an editorial over the summer. “The Vélib’ was aimed at civilizing city travel. It has increased incivilities.”
The heavy, sandy-bronze Vélib’ bicycles are seen as an accoutrement of the “bobos,” or “bourgeois-bohèmes,” the trendy urban middle class, and they stir resentment and covetousness. They are often being vandalized in a socially divided Paris by resentful, angry or anarchic youth, the police and sociologists say.
Bruno Marzloff, a sociologist who specializes in transportation, said, “One must relate this to other incivilities, and especially the burning of cars,” referring to gangs of immigrant youths burning cars during riots in the suburbs in 2005.
He said he believed there was social revolt behind Vélib’ vandalism, especially for suburban residents, many of them poor immigrants who feel excluded from the glamorous side of Paris.
“It is an outcry, a form of rebellion; this violence is not gratuitous,” Mr. Marzloff said. “There is an element of negligence that means, ‘We don’t have the right to mobility like other people, to get to Paris it’s a huge pain, we don’t have cars, and when we do, it’s too expensive and too far.’ ”
Used mainly for commuting in the urban core of the city, the Vélib’ program is by many measures a success. After swiping a credit card for a deposit at an electronic docking station, a rider pays one euro per day, or 29 euros (about $43) for an annual pass, for unlimited access to the bikes for 30-minute periods that can be extended for a small fee.
Daily use averages 50,000 to 150,000 trips, depending on the season, and the bicycles have proved to be a hit with tourists, who help power the economy.
But the extra-solid construction and electronic docks mean the bikes, made in Hungary, are expensive, and not everyone shares the spirit of joint public property promoted by Paris’s Socialist mayor, Bertrand Delanoë.
“We miscalculated the damage and the theft,” said Albert Asséraf, director of strategy, research and marketing at JCDecaux, the outdoor-advertising company that is a major financer and organizer of the project. “But we had no reference point in the world for this kind of initiative.”
At least 8,000 bikes have been stolen and 8,000 damaged so badly that they had to be replaced — nearly 80 percent of the initial stock, Mr. Asséraf said.
JCDecaux must repair some 1,500 bicycles a day. The company maintains 10 repair shops and a workshop on a boat that moves up and down the Seine.
JCDecaux reinforced the bicycles’ chains and baskets and added better theft protection, strengthening the mechanisms that attach them to the electronic parking docks, since an incompletely secured bike is much easier to steal. But the damage and theft continued.
“We made the bike stronger, ran ad campaigns against vandalism and tried to better inform people on the Web,” Mr. Asséraf said. But “the real solution is just individual respect.”
In 2008 , the number of infractions related to Vélib’ vandalism rose 54 percent, according to the Paris police.
“We found many stolen Vélib’s in Paris’s troubled neighborhoods,” said Marie Lajus, a spokeswoman for the police. “It’s not profit-making delinquency, but rather young boys, especially from the suburbs, consider the Vélib’ an object that has no value.”
Sometimes the bikes are also victims of good old adolescent anarchic fun. These attitudes are expressed by the “freeriders,” and a bicycle forum, where a mock poll asks riders whether the Vélib’ can do wheelies, go down stairs and make decent skid marks.
It is commonplace now to see the bikes at docking stations in Paris with flat tires, punctured wheels or missing baskets. Some Vélib’s have been found hanging from lampposts, dumped in the Seine, used on the streets of Bucharest or resting in shipping containers on their way to North Africa. Some are simply appropriated and repainted.
Finding a decent one is now something of an urban treasure hunt. Géraldine Bernard, 31, of Paris rides a Vélib’ to work every day but admits having difficulties lately finding functioning bikes.
“It’s a very clever initiative to improve people’s lives, but it’s not a complete success,” she said.
“For a regular user like me, it generates a lot of frustration,” she said. “It’s a reflection of the violence of our society and it’s outrageous: the Vélib’ is a public good but there is no civic feeling related to it.”
Still, with more than 63 million rentals since the program was begun in mid-2007, the Vélib’ is an established part of Parisian life, and the program has been extended to provide 4,000 Vélib’s in 29 towns on the city’s edges.
So despite the increasing costs, Paris and JCDecaux are pressing on. The company invested about $140 million to set up the system and provides a yearly fee of about $5.5 million to Paris, which also gets rental fees for the bikes. In return, the company’s 10-year contract allows it to put up 1,628 billboards that it can rent.
Although JCDecaux will not discuss money figures, the expected date for profitability has been set back. But the City of Paris has agreed to pay JCDecaux about $600 for each stolen or irreparably damaged bike if the number exceeds 4 percent of the fleet, which it clearly does.
In an unsuccessful effort to stop vandalism, Paris began an advertising campaign this summer. Posters showed a cartoon Vélib’ being roughed up by a thug. The caption read: “It’s easy to beat up a Vélib’, it can’t defend itself. Vélib’ belongs to you, protect it!”
# # #
Some on-street fact checking:
So dear reader, to give you a whiff of the on-street reality of Vélib on this beautiful Fall day, I went out to do a little informal field work/fact checking early this morning. I visited half a dozen of the stations in the area indicated in the following map (which by the way you can use yourselves to check out station and bike status at http://www.parisavelo.net/). For a total of about 130 parking slots, I counted 41 parked bikes, 34 of which ready to go ,and the reminder with what appear to be some minor adjustments that the technicians should be able to handle readily and right on the spot (at least most of them).
As a daily user of Vélib, what can I say but that it works and that JCDecaux continues to do a sufficiently good job of keeping them on the street, such that a good part of the people I know are regular users. (What JCD cannot fix though, is that city traffic, despite all that has been done with over 400 Kms of pretty safe cycling provision, is such that really only confirmed cyclists should be trying this. But for us – and there are now a couple of hundred thousand regular users – it's a snap.)
Here are three sample stations from my morning trip.
To conclude:
Our friends at the Times have a lot of the standard numbers right (we envy them bitterly their fact checkers), but somehow once again they have dug up the fantastic number that a single Vélib cost $3,500. Who gave them that number? One does have to wonder why they have decided to reheat this old chestnut. Perhaps it's a Halloween story. Sure, that must be it. Happy Halloween.
On the other hand, I have to be perfectly frank with you: I have yet to try one in Bucharest, Marrakesh or in the Seine. But if you have, please, World Streets would like to hear from you.
Eric Britton
Editor
PS. And oh yes, despite all the kvetching, we really do love you NYT and want you to hang in there with your generally exemplary reporting. No one goes ten for ten in the Majors.
Saturday, October 31, 2009
There they go again, burying poor old Vélib.
(Hey New York Times, read World Streets.)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Eric, you show that 20-25% of bikes on a few stands on a Saturday morning are not ready. How early is it? Maybe around 9.30 or 10 by the looks of the shadows and your latitude... or earlier: There is no traffic in evidence.
ReplyDeleteI am no math whiz, but it seems easy to see how a 20-25% at any one time can equal 80% over the whole time.
You present this partly to contrast the one - just one specific example NYT gives in the most recent story - of a woman who has trouble during the week.
The huge cost they give per bike is probably totally erroneous, but in terms of positives the article has many.
So, s'il vous plait, give us some insights on these people who are apparently destroying the bikes, and their back story - and figures. Let us know if there is something Velib' can do to help them, if any of their anger is related to a huge advertising multi-national being the owner... the bikes are not "free" after all: Most people pay for them in higher prices on consumer products, because it is well known a significant portion of the sales price is due to advertising costs. But only some of these people benefit directly, the ones fortunate enough to live inside the city.
Here is an example of how poorly researched and reported news travels fast. This from the Charleston Daily Mail in Charleston Virginia USA,
ReplyDeletewith the author spinning his tale 100% on what he read in the paper.
We all need to be more careful with the truth.
Eric Britton
Editor, World Streets
- - - - - - - - - -
Source: http://blogs.dailymail.com/donsurber/archives/2836
eco-criminality
The tree-huggers of Paris came up with a plan. People would rent bicycles around the city, and ride them to another part of the city and turn them in to another bike rental shop.
The rental would be 1 euro a day or 29 euros a year
The specially designed bikes cost $3,500 each.
But guess what? People are not so honest. You give them a $3,500 bike for $1.50 and they will pedal that bike away and you will never see it again. These overpriced bikes are selling well on the black market in Eastern Europe and North Africa.
With 80 percent of the initial 20,600 bicycles stolen or damaged, the Program's organizers have had to hire several hundred people just to fix them. And along with the dent in the city-subsidized budget has been a blow to the Parisian psyche,� the New York Times reported.
So the company that is behind this just went bust, right?
Wrong.
And I'm pretty sure the company, JCDecaux, had an ulterior motive for going into this silly
So despite the increasing costs, Paris and JCDecaux are pressing on. The company invested about $140 million to set up the system and
provides a yearly fee of about $5.5 million to Paris, which also gets rental fees for the bikes. In return, the companys 10-year contract allows it to put up 1,628 billboards that it can rent,� the New York Times reported.
So there is a possibility that the company is making enough money off the billboards to offset the losses on the bikes.
As for the city, it has agreed to spend $600 per bike for every bike stolen or damaged beyond 4%, so it is paying a shade less than $9.4 million a year to replace or repair those bikes. It may be making money on its share of teh rental fees, but the $5.5 million yearly fee is eaten up quickly under this agreement.
I just love how naive and trusting everyone is in Paris. When he is done being president, maybe Barack Obama can become the Mayor of Paris.
Eric,
ReplyDeleteif you look at the Times weekend blog (opinionator – I can’t find the ink right now but it is up and live) on cash for clunkers most of the blogging is this kind of venting by the right.
I have asked many prominent enviros and climate people (Paul Ehrlich, Steve Schneider) and they agree, the right and the contrarians must NOT be underestimated. Indeed, my nephew, Joshua Howe, is getting is PhD at Stanford in the history of the climate debate, and it is all about this kind of vituperation.
A few years ago the Christian Science Monitor talked to me about externalities, and I said it was important to internalize them so “Americans see the true cost of driving”. I was honored when a right wing blogger accused me of wanting to punish the American People.
That is how bad the “wrong wing” is in the US, and it really discolors the true debate.
Lee Schipper, Ph.D
Berkeley
Mobility Magazine commented on their link:
ReplyDelete"Absolutely! I was blown away by how fantastic Velib is - yes, perhaps there are better versions, yes, perhaps a whole lot of things about it, but how we dream of such a project here! And talk about re-hashing the same old 'news' over and over..."
Eric,
ReplyDeleteThe idea that vandalizing Velibs is a form of social revolt. In some ways it's obvious, but what does it mean? That Velib is such a success that it is identified with prestige and privilege, and therefore envy?
How to re-position it as being "of the people" and grassroots? And not a symbol of trendiness and affluence.
This is a relevant and urgent question for introducing public bike elsewhere. Like in Toronto, for example.
There's a blog for a Canadian magazine that is speculating about the adoption of public bikes here. I'm quoted in it, that's how I know of it. If you want to slum in the debating going on in the colonies, have a look.
http://www.walrusmagazine.com/blogs/2009/10/20/driving-the-lane-toronto-prepares-for-public-bicycling/
Christopher Sumpton, Toronto Canada
Director of teh CBC documentary Pedal Power, http://www.cbc.ca/documentaries/doczone/2009/pedalpower/-
Eric,
ReplyDeleteI'd say there a fervent hope here in Australia too that we'll get bike share too.
I see these sit-up bikes with their baskets, as perhaps a way to swing part of our cycle culture away from speed and Lycra.
They'll bring new riders to bikes and many of them will be women who'll feel safer on the slower sit up bikes even if our skimpy bike-ways don't get better quickly. At the moment only about 15% of cyclists are women
But will we get Bike Share? A contract has just been signed in Melbourne and the winning consortium plans to bring in the Montreal designed, Bixis.
But as people working for the company admit to my camera after a recent presentation. No bike share scheme has ever been set up in a country with compulsory helmet laws such as we have.
It seems it's virtually impossible to dispense a sterilized and tested helmet automatically on the street with a bike.
How ironic it would be if the only thing our Federal Govt has ever done for bike safety, the helmet law, ends up sabotaging bike share which itself would probably do more for cycle safety, by increasing cycling numbers, than helmets themselves.
In the film clip, Alison Cohen who works for the successful bidder, the US company ALTA, bravely ponders how helmets might yet be provided.
Cheers, Mike Rubbo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZriJe1CO7-k
Bike building is not rocket-science. Why anyone would pay over $100 for a bike--especially in wholesale numbers is astounding. I have 2 bikes here at home I bought for $6 each at a garage sale. The trouble with govt. schemes is they are run by GOVT.
ReplyDeleteAn article in The New York Times, titled "French Ideal of Bicycle-sharing Meets Reality" discusses the problem Paris has been having with vandalism and theft of bike-sharing bikes with 80% of the initial bikes having been replaced. Data has been hard to come by, however, Velib' is an outlayer in terms of theft and vandalism in a bike-sharing programs due to social unrest in the Parisian suburbs. Until recently, the suburbs have generally been a place in America, where those who can afford to leave the ills of the city, have fled. In Paris, however, the suburbs are a place for those who cannot afford to live in the luxury of the city.
ReplyDeleteThere's technology and demography. I'm not aware of problems with JCDecaux's technology working poorly in other cities that use their system, so demography is the key issue. There's a great deal of social unrest in Paris' suburbs as sociologist Bruno Marzloff stated in The New York Times article. A European Working Conditions Observatory report highlights just how bad things are in France's suburbs with "the unemployment rate... between 35% and 54% for men, between 40% and 60% for women, and between 30% and 50% for young people."
Instead of ad campaigns telling people to respect the bikes, JCDecaux and the City of Paris should be using the bikes to respect the people, if they aren't already. The very same individuals who are damaging the bikes should be employed by JCDecaux to repair them. Until the super high unemployment rates decrease, the social unrest will continue and bike-sharing as a representative of the City will be a pawn in their battles.
Outside of the social unrest factor, bike-sharing is a good value for its expense. If you calculate the cost per trip of moving a person by bike-sharing, foot, transit, and car, I'd put my money on bike-sharing being the most cost efficient at moving a person per mile. The cost of building a mile of track or asphalt for the other vehicles is expensive, compared to that of what a bike needs.
In this calcuation you would need to include the public health benefits in terms of decreased medical expenses due to increased activity, lowered emissions, and increased productivity as folks can spend their time where they want to be, rather than stuck in traffic. Cities spend hundreds of millions working on these issues and bike-sharing leverages benefits associated with each.
You would also need to include in this calculation how much positive publicity Paris has garnered from around the world for their bold bike-sharing innovation. It seems as if everybody has heard about "those bikes in Paris" even if they don't know what Velib' or bike-sharing is. The value of this publicity alone has got to be in the tens or hundreds of millions of dollars. France continues to remain at the top of the list of countries with international tourist arrivals, according to the World Tourism Organization, and it's likely that many of these visitors are visiting Paris and are one of the up to 145,000 trips per day that are made on Velib'.
So I'd say that even with a high vandalism and theft rate that bike-sharing is too important to Paris for it to shutter its program. Bike-sharing isn't the problem, it's part of the solution, if we let it be.
Paul DeMaio, Washington DC USA
The Bike-sharing Blog